Choose your situation

WHAT YOU WILL PRODUCE
  • Scope an operating pilot around accountable engineering work.
  • Make one finding travel through ownership, remediation and deployed verification.
  • Choose metrics with defined populations and decision consequences.

A bounded pilot charter, one completed finding-state analysis and a metric definition tied to an improvement decision.

BEFORE YOU START
  • Know one product’s delivery process and who can change it.
  • Use the small-program guide’s fictional pilot when organization data is unavailable.
Example journey: Service inventory → risk tiers → minimum security practices
1

Find the owners

Produce a pilot inventory linking one product’s services, repositories, deployment paths and sensitive assets to accountable engineering owners. Record unassigned ownership and excluded services as gaps, and state the security and review capacity available. Finish with a scope the team can operate; an incomplete but explicit inventory is more useful than an organization-wide claim with no responsible people.

2

Choose a small baseline

Define a few consequential change triggers, release expectations and finding states, and write remediation targets that depend on exploitation evidence and exposure rather than severity alone. Name who implements, who verifies and who may accept residual business risk. Use the connected pilot to write one concrete exception condition and expiry. Finish when a missed review or failed test leads to a specified decision instead of an unowned queue or an automatic release bypass.

3

Make the work repeatable

Carry one supplied finding from report through cause, assigned fix, regression and deployed closure, retaining artifact and evidence IDs at each transition; fix ready, exception active and verified closed are different states. Name a security champion in the pilot team to triage first and spread the fix pattern, and use the CI guide to connect the tested build to the release. Finish when the record exposes missing ownership or evidence without asking the security team to approve every routine change.

4

Measure useful outcomes

Define eligible changes, reviewed changes, confirmed findings, deployed fixes and expired exceptions before calculating rates. Include open age and capacity so that closing easy work cannot hide long-lived exposure. Recalculate the pilot’s metric from its supplied counts, then choose one improvement with an owner and a follow-up observation. Map the pilot to SSDF practices or a SAMM assessment only once the loop runs, so the framework describes real work. Finish with a decision supported by the measure, not a dashboard whose denominator or next action is unclear.

Practice

To build the skills behind this job step by step, follow the learning path Build an evidence-driven security program.

Work products

Use the blank work product for your system. Compare its required evidence with a completed synthetic example.

Download blank work product Download completed example